Skip to content
GSC Identity
Products Services Integrations Trust Center
This program
How the program works Who should apply FAQ
Sign in Apply to become a design partner →
Mission Control Founding Design Partner Program

We’re selecting 1–3 organizations to help define the future of identity operations.

Bring us a real identity challenge. Together, we’ll establish the baseline, deploy Mission Control against a focused use case, measure the outcome, and determine the path to production.

  • Paid, outcome-driven proof of concept
  • Direct engagement with GSC Identity
  • Defined success criteria
  • Application required
01 — The program

What is a Founding Design Partner?

A Founding Design Partner is an early enterprise customer that works directly with GSC Identity to apply Mission Control to a real identity problem.

It is more involved than a software demo and more structured than an ordinary beta test. The purpose is to generate measurable evidence around a meaningful use case — and to determine, on that evidence, whether Mission Control should move into a larger production deployment.

Your organization provides

  • Access to the relevant business problem
  • The right stakeholders and workflow knowledge
  • An approved technical environment for the agreed scope
  • Structured, candid feedback

GSC Identity provides

  • Discovery and use-case definition
  • Baseline analysis
  • Implementation guidance and direct engagement
  • Outcome measurement
  • An agreed avenue for roadmap feedback
02 — How it works

What participation entails

Six stages, each with a clear purpose and a clear output. The engagement timeline is established according to the approved use case and scope — not fixed in advance.

  1. 01

    Qualification

    Confirm organizational fit, identity challenge, sponsorship, urgency, and readiness.

  2. 02

    Discovery

    Define the current problem, affected workflows, systems, stakeholders, and business impact.

  3. 03

    Success Planning

    Agree on the scope, baseline, success criteria, responsibilities, deliverables, security requirements, and commercial terms.

  4. 04

    Focused Proof of Concept

    Apply Mission Control to the selected use case within an approved and controlled scope.

  5. 05

    Measurement & Feedback

    Evaluate the results against the agreed baseline and collect structured product and workflow feedback.

  6. 06

    Production Decision

    Review the evidence and decide whether to stop, refine the use case, extend the engagement, or proceed toward production deployment.

03 — What you receive

What a Founding Design Partner receives

  • Direct access to leadership

    Work directly with GSC Identity leadership and product experts — not a queue.

  • Focused assessment

    A focused assessment of the identity challenge you select.

  • Baseline & success criteria

    A clearly defined baseline and success criteria, agreed before work begins.

  • Structured proof of concept

    A structured Mission Control proof of concept within an approved, controlled scope.

  • Measured indicators

    Measurement of the agreed operational, risk, visibility, or economic indicators.

  • Structured product input

    The ability to provide structured input on the product capabilities relevant to your use case.

  • Priority roadmap consideration

    Priority consideration for selected roadmap requirements.

  • Founding-partner terms

    Preferential founding-partner commercial terms, subject to the final agreement.

  • Production recommendation

    A documented production recommendation at the conclusion of the engagement.

  • Optional case study

    A potential case study or co-marketing opportunity — only with your separate written approval.

On roadmap influence: design partners shape priorities through structured input and priority consideration. This does not mean control of the roadmap, guaranteed development of any feature, or exclusivity.

04 — What we expect

What GSC Identity expects from a partner

A qualified organization should have:

  • A real and sufficiently important identity problem
  • An executive sponsor or empowered internal champion
  • Participation from relevant identity, security, IT, compliance, procurement, and business stakeholders
  • The ability to define the current environment and workflow
  • The ability to provide approved access, sample data, integrations, or technical support required for the agreed scope
  • A commitment to regular working sessions and candid feedback
  • A willingness to establish measurable success criteria
  • A credible path to production if the proof of concept succeeds
  • Budget for a paid proof of concept
  • Authority and readiness to complete legal, security, privacy, and procurement reviews
05 — Who should apply

Built for complex, regulated identity environments

  • Healthcare organizations

    Clinical and workforce access spread across EHR, HR, and dozens of applications — under HIPAA-driven scrutiny.

  • Government agencies

    Large, long-lived identity populations with strict accountability, audit, and procurement requirements.

  • Higher-education institutions

    Students, faculty, staff, affiliates, and alumni moving through constantly changing roles.

  • Regulated enterprises

    Financial services, energy, insurance, and others where identity evidence must stand up to regulators.

  • Managed service providers

    Identity operations delivered across many client tenants, where visibility and repeatability drive margin.

  • Identity & cybersecurity consultancies

    Firms that design and run identity programs and want a stronger operating model for their clients.

Best fit

This program is best suited for organizations where identity complexity is already creating measurable cost, risk, delay, administrative burden, or limited operational visibility.

06 — The problems we want

Identity challenges we’re looking for

Mission Control is built to complement the identity investments you already have — Microsoft Entra, SailPoint, Okta, CyberArk, ServiceNow, HR systems, and your applications — not to become another disconnected tool. These are the problems we most want to put it against.

  • Lifecycle & offboarding gaps

    People who change roles or leave keep access longer than the business intended, because joiner, mover, and leaver steps don’t complete reliably.

  • Stale & orphaned access

    Accounts and access that remain active after the business need has ended.

  • Access reviews & certifications

    Review campaigns that consume weeks of manager time yet still end in approvals nobody can confidently defend.

  • Non-human identities

    Service accounts, API keys, and other non-human identities with no clear owner, purpose, or review cycle.

  • Workflows that fail silently

    Provisioning and deprovisioning processes that fail without giving identity teams a clear explanation of where or why.

  • Disconnected platforms

    Entra, SailPoint, Okta, CyberArk, ServiceNow, HR, and application systems that each hold part of the truth, with no single view across them.

  • Application onboarding backlog

    Applications waiting months to come under governance because each integration is handled as a one-off project.

  • Manual identity operations

    Skilled identity staff spending their week on tickets, spreadsheets, and repetitive work that should be routine.

  • Unconfirmed provisioning

    No reliable way to confirm that access was actually granted or removed in each downstream system — rather than just requested.

  • Access & license waste

    Paying for software licenses and access nobody is using, because entitlement and usage data live in different places.

  • Scattered audit evidence

    Audit and compliance evidence assembled by hand from several systems every time an auditor asks.

  • Unmeasured economics

    No credible way to put a cost on identity operations, so investment decisions rely on anecdote.

  • Risk without business terms

    Identity risk that can’t be expressed in the financial and operational terms executives and boards use to decide.

07 — Clear expectations

What this program is not

Being clear up front protects both organizations’ time. The Founding Design Partner Program is not:

  • A free beta-testing program
  • A free security assessment
  • An unlimited consulting engagement
  • A commitment to build custom software without an agreed scope
  • An assurance that every requested feature will enter the product roadmap
  • A replacement for your organization’s procurement, legal, security, or privacy review
  • A guarantee of savings, compliance, certification, or security outcomes
  • Automatic acceptance into the program
08 — Apply

Founding Design Partner application

Five short steps, about 10–15 minutes. We review every application for organizational fit, the identity challenge, sponsorship, readiness, and the potential for measurable outcomes.

Please don’t include confidential or sensitive details. Describe your challenge at a business level. Do not enter credentials, tenant IDs, hostnames, architecture diagrams, personal data about employees or customers, or any regulated, privileged, or export-controlled information. Those details belong in discovery, under a formal agreement.

Step 1 of 5 — Organization

Your organization

Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

About you

Please use your organization email address.

09 — FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is a Founding Design Partner?

An early enterprise customer that works directly with GSC Identity to apply Mission Control Identity OS™ to a real, measurable identity problem. Together we define the use case, establish a baseline, run a focused proof of concept, measure the outcome, and decide on the path to production.

How is this different from a beta program?

A beta program typically gives many users early access in exchange for general feedback. This program is selective, paid, and structured: each engagement has a defined scope, timeline, baseline, success criteria, deliverables, and decision point, and GSC Identity works directly with each partner. Mission Control is published on Microsoft Marketplace; the program is about proving measurable value on a specific use case, not testing an unfinished product.

Is the engagement paid?

Yes. The Founding Design Partner engagement is a paid, outcome-driven proof of concept. Pricing and scope are determined after the qualification and discovery process, and founding partners receive preferential commercial terms, subject to the final agreement.

How many organizations will be selected?

One to three. We are deliberately limiting the program so that GSC Identity can work directly and closely with each organization.

What types of organizations should apply?

Healthcare organizations, government agencies, higher-education institutions, regulated enterprises, managed service providers, and identity or cybersecurity consulting firms — particularly those where identity complexity is already creating measurable cost, risk, delay, administrative burden, or limited visibility.

Does applying guarantee acceptance?

No. Applications are reviewed for organizational fit, the nature of the identity challenge, sponsorship, readiness, and the potential for measurable outcomes. Only qualified applicants will be contacted for the next stage, and only one to three organizations will be selected.

What does the organization need to provide?

A meaningful identity problem; an executive sponsor or empowered champion; the relevant stakeholders and workflow knowledge; approved access, sample data, integrations, or technical support for the agreed scope; regular working sessions and candid feedback; budget for a paid proof of concept; and the ability to complete legal, security, privacy, and procurement reviews.

What does GSC Identity provide?

Discovery and use-case definition, baseline analysis, implementation guidance, direct engagement with GSC Identity leadership and product experts, measurement against the agreed success criteria, an agreed avenue for roadmap feedback, and a documented production recommendation at the end of the engagement.

Can a partner influence the Mission Control roadmap?

Yes, within defined limits. Partners provide structured input on the capabilities relevant to their use case and receive priority consideration for selected roadmap requirements. Roadmap decisions remain with GSC Identity.

Does roadmap influence guarantee that a feature will be built?

No. Roadmap influence does not mean roadmap control, guaranteed feature development, or exclusivity. Any commitment to specific functionality would need to be agreed explicitly in writing as part of the engagement scope.

How will confidential information be protected?

Through the formal agreement. Before any proof of concept begins, security, privacy, confidentiality, data-handling, and intellectual-property terms are agreed in writing, and the approved scope defines which systems and data are involved and how access is granted. Participation does not mean surrendering ownership of your organization’s confidential information. The initial application should contain no confidential information at all.

Does an applicant need to be a Microsoft customer?

No. Mission Control is published on Microsoft Marketplace, which some organizations prefer for procurement, but the program is open to organizations running any combination of identity platforms — including SailPoint, Okta, CyberArk, ServiceNow, and custom workflows.

What happens after the proof of concept?

We review the evidence together against the agreed baseline and success criteria. The outcome is a decision: stop, refine the use case, extend the engagement, or proceed toward a production deployment under a separate agreement.

Can the organization participate in a case study?

Possibly, but only if you want to. Any case study, reference, logo use, or co-marketing requires your separate written approval and is never a condition of participation.

What should not be submitted through the application form?

Credentials, API keys, tenant or directory IDs, hostnames or IP addresses, architecture diagrams, security findings, personal data about employees or customers, and any confidential, regulated, privileged, or export-controlled information. Describe the challenge at a business level; specifics come later, under a formal agreement.

Bring us the identity problem your current tools cannot show you clearly.

We are selecting 1–3 organizations prepared to define the problem, measure the baseline, test the outcome, and help shape a better identity operating model.

Apply for the Founding Design Partner Program

Paid engagement. Application required. Selection is limited.